Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Types of Resources
    • Amplicon Sequence Collections
    • Culture Collections/Mutant Libraries
    • Databases and Software
    • Omics Data Sets
    • Other Genetic Resources
    • Genome Sequences
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MRA
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Microbiology Resource Announcements
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Types of Resources
    • Amplicon Sequence Collections
    • Culture Collections/Mutant Libraries
    • Databases and Software
    • Omics Data Sets
    • Other Genetic Resources
    • Genome Sequences
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MRA
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Genome Sequences

Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus Strain S6-61 and Vibrio diabolicus Strain S7-71, Isolated from Corals in the Andaman Sea

Sushanta Deb, Jhasketan Badhai, Subrata K. Das
Vincent Bruno, Editor
Sushanta Deb
aDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jhasketan Badhai
aDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subrata K. Das
aDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Bruno
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01465-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report the draft genome sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus strain S6-61 and Vibrio diabolicus strain S7-71, isolated from the corals Pocillopora verrucosa and Fungia danai, respectively. The genomes of strains S6-61 and S7-71 contain 4,880 and 4,641 protein coding genes, respectively, and harbor genes associated with the ectoine biosynthesis pathway.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Vibrio alginolyticus is a halo-tolerant mesophilic Gram-negative bacterium and has been characterized as an opportunist pathogen in humans and marine animals (1). Earlier studies have reported that the type III secretion system (T3SS) in Vibrio alginolyticus leads to severe fish disease, resulting in economic losses in the aquaculture industry (2). In contrast, Vibrio diabolicus is a heterotrophic, facultatively anaerobic, mesophilic bacterium, first isolated from an annelid Alvinella pompejana collected from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent (3). This bacterium can produce exopolysaccharide (EPS), which has importance in the biotechnological industry and human health (4). The identified ectoine and 2C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathways in these bacteria are known to be associated with osmotic regulation and pathogenicity of bacterial cells (5, 6).

The bacterial strains used in this study were isolated from corals in the Andaman Sea. Coral samples were collected from Pocillopora verrucosa near North Bay (11°42′14.0″N, 92°45′05.7″E) and from Fungia danai near John Lawrence Island (12°01′33.8″N, 93°00′36.7″E). The isolation of bacteria and growth conditions were described earlier (7). Genomic DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Germany). The quality (A260/280 ratio) and concentration of the DNA were determined using the NanoDrop 8000 UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer and the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The DNA was sheared to an average length of 10 kb using a g-TUBE device, as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The fragmented DNA was used for SMRTbell library preparation as recommended by the manufacturer. The quantity and quality of the SMRTbell libraries were evaluated using the high-sensitivity double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) kit and Qubit fluorometer and the DNA 12000 kit on the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Sequencing was performed on the PacBio Sequel sequencing system (Pacific Biosciences, USA).

Quality control of the sequence reads was performed using the –correct and –trim parameters built into the Canu 1.3 program. De novo genome assembly of PacBio reads was performed with the Canu 1.3 assembler (https://github.com/marbl/canu/) (parameters: correct; p, bacteria; merylMemory, 15; batThreads, 12; stopOnLowCoverage, 100; genomeSize, 5.2m) (8). Scaffolding was performed using the Single Molecular Integrative Scaffolding (SMIS) pipeline (https://github.com/fg6/smis) (parameters: score, 50; len, 2000; step, 200; contig, 3000; edge, 5) (9). Finally, the gaps were filled with the help of PBJelly (parameters: minMatch, 8; minPctIdentity, 70; bestn, 1; nCandidates, 10; maxScore, 500; nproc, 8; noSplitSubreads) (10). A total of 680,654 and 1,057,603 PacBio reads were assembled into two draft genomes with sequencing coverage of ∼500-fold. A Perl script (https://github.com/tomdeman-bio/Sequence-scripts/blob/master/calc_N50_GC_genomesize.pl) was used to calculate the statistical elements of the assembled genome (Table 1). The draft genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP version 4.9) with default parameters (11). The final draft genome assemblies of strains S6-61 and S7-71 are summarized in Table 1. Putative pathways in the bacterial genomes were identified using the KEGG pathway analysis tool (12). The Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) functional categories of the predicted protein coding genes were identified using the Perl script cdd2cog (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts/tree/master/cdd2cog) (13).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Characteristics of the draft genome sequences and accession numbers of the two Vibrio strains

Comparative genomic analysis was performed for identification of the strains described in this study. Strains S6-61 and S7-71 showed 99.87% and 99.68% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to Vibrio alginolyticus strain NBRC 15630 and Vibrio diabolicus strain LMG 3418, respectively. In addition, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) was determined using the JSpeciesWS server (14). The ANI relatedness of strain S6-61 with the reference strain Vibrio alginolyticus NBRC15630 was 98.12%. Similarly, strain S7-71 had an ANI relatedness of 97.94% with the reference strain Vibrio diabolicus LMG 3418. These values are above the threshold ANI value (96%) for species delineation (15), suggesting that strains S6-61 and S7-71 belong to the species Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio diabolicus, respectively. Furthermore, in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (isDDH) values between strain S6-61 and Vibrio alginolyticus strain NBRC 15630 and between strain S7-71 and Vibrio diabolicus strain LMG 3418 were 85.60% and 83.30%, respectively, which are above the well-recognized cutoffs (≥70% isDDH) for bacterial species delineation. COG functional analysis revealed that the respective genomes of strains S6-61 and S7-71 contain genes involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism (4.4% and 4.8%), lipid transport and metabolism (2.6% and 2.9%), transcription (7.1% and 6.8%), signal transduction mechanisms (5.6% and 6.0%), and unclassified functions (13.9% and 11.11%).

The presence of predicted genes for ectoine biosynthesis suggests that these bacteria can resist osmotic stress in marine environments. In addition, the MEP pathway in V. alginolyticus strain S6-61 can be used as a potential drug target.

Data availability.The whole-genome shotgun sequences of strains S6-61 and S7-71 have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers WAHT00000000 and VYYA00000000, respectively (Table 1). The SRA data are available at the NCBI SRA database under the accession numbers SRR10194733 and SRR10194627, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the funding received by S.K.D. from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India (MoES/11-MRDF/1/59/P/08). S.D. and J.B. acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India, New Delhi, for providing research fellowships.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 November 2019.
    • Accepted 4 February 2020.
    • Published 20 February 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Deb et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhao Z,
    2. Chen C,
    3. Hu CQ,
    4. Ren CH,
    5. Zhao JJ,
    6. Zhang LP,
    7. Jiang X,
    8. Luo P,
    9. Wang QB
    . 2010. The type III secretion system of Vibrio alginolyticus induces rapid apoptosis, cell rounding and osmotic lysis of fish cells. Microbiology 156:2864–2872. doi:10.1099/mic.0.040626-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pang H,
    2. Qiu M,
    3. Zhao J,
    4. Hoare R,
    5. Monaghan SJ,
    6. Song D,
    7. Chang Y,
    8. Jian J
    . 2018. Construction of a Vibrio alginolyticus hopPmaJ (hop) mutant and evaluation of its potential as a live attenuated vaccine in orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Fish Shellfish Immunol 76:93–100. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2018.02.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Raguénès G,
    2. Christen R,
    3. Guezennec J,
    4. Pignet P,
    5. Barbier G
    . 1997. Vibrio diabolicus sp. nov., a new polysaccharide-secreting organism isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaete annelid, Alvinella pompejana. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:989–995. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-4-989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Goudenège D,
    2. Boursicot V,
    3. Versigny T,
    4. Bonnetot S,
    5. Ratiskol J,
    6. Sinquin C,
    7. LaPointe G,
    8. Le Roux F,
    9. Delbarre-Ladrat C
    . 2014. Genome sequence of Vibrio diabolicus and identification of the exopolysaccharide HE800 biosynthesis locus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:10165–10176. doi:10.1007/s00253-014-6086-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Reshetnikov AS,
    2. Khmelenina VN,
    3. Mustakhimov II,
    4. Trotsenko YA
    . 2011. Genes and enzymes of ectoine biosynthesis in halotolerant methanotrophs. Methods Enzymol 495:15–30. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386905-0.00002-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Heuston S,
    2. Begley M,
    3. Gahan CGM,
    4. Hill C
    . 2012. Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 158:1389–1401. doi:10.1099/mic.0.051599-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Badhai J,
    2. Kumari P,
    3. Krishnan P,
    4. Ramamurthy T,
    5. Das SK
    . 2013. Presence of SXT integrating conjugative element in marine bacteria isolated from the mucus of the coral Fungia echinata from Andaman Sea. FEMS Microbiol Lett 338:118–123. doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Koren S,
    2. Walenz BP,
    3. Berlin K,
    4. Miller JR,
    5. Bergman NH,
    6. Phillippy AM
    . 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi:10.1101/gr.215087.116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mullikin JC,
    2. Ning Z
    . 2003. The phusion assembler. Genome Res 13:81–90. doi:10.1101/gr.731003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. English AC,
    2. Richards S,
    3. Han Y,
    4. Wang M,
    5. Vee V,
    6. Qu J,
    7. Qin X,
    8. Muzny DM,
    9. Reid JG,
    10. Worley KC,
    11. Gibbs RA
    . 2012. Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS One 7:e47768. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047768.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tatusova T,
    2. DiCuccio M,
    3. Badretdin A,
    4. Chetvernin V,
    5. Nawrocki EP,
    6. Zaslavsky L,
    7. Lomsadze A,
    8. Pruitt KD,
    9. Borodovsky M,
    10. Ostell J
    . 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kanehisa M,
    2. Sato Y,
    3. Morishima K
    . 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Leimbach A
    . 2016. bac-genomics-scripts: bovine E. coli mastitis comparative genomics edition. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.215824.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Richter M,
    2. Rosselló-Móra R,
    3. Glöckner FO,
    4. Peplies J
    . 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Richter M,
    2. Rosselló-Móra R
    . 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906412106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus Strain S6-61 and Vibrio diabolicus Strain S7-71, Isolated from Corals in the Andaman Sea
Sushanta Deb, Jhasketan Badhai, Subrata K. Das
Microbiology Resource Announcements Feb 2020, 9 (8) e01465-19; DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01465-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Microbiology Resource Announcements article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus Strain S6-61 and Vibrio diabolicus Strain S7-71, Isolated from Corals in the Andaman Sea
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Microbiology Resource Announcements
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Microbiology Resource Announcements.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Draft Genome Sequences of Vibrio alginolyticus Strain S6-61 and Vibrio diabolicus Strain S7-71, Isolated from Corals in the Andaman Sea
Sushanta Deb, Jhasketan Badhai, Subrata K. Das
Microbiology Resource Announcements Feb 2020, 9 (8) e01465-19; DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01465-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ANNOUNCEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MRA
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Getting Started
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us
  • ASM Author Center

Follow #MRAJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2576-098X