Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Types of Resources
    • Amplicon Sequence Collections
    • Culture Collections/Mutant Libraries
    • Databases and Software
    • Omics Data Sets
    • Other Genetic Resources
    • Genome Sequences
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MRA
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Microbiology Resource Announcements
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Types of Resources
    • Amplicon Sequence Collections
    • Culture Collections/Mutant Libraries
    • Databases and Software
    • Omics Data Sets
    • Other Genetic Resources
    • Genome Sequences
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MRA
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Prokaryotes

Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter concisus ATCC 33237T and Draft Genome Sequences for an Additional Eight Well-Characterized C. concisus Strains

Angela J. Cornelius, William G. Miller, Albert J. Lastovica, Stephen L. W. On, Nigel P. French, Olivier Vandenberg, Patrick J. Biggs
Angela J. Cornelius
a Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. (ESR), Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William G. Miller
b U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Lastovica
c University of Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen L. W. On
d Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nigel P. French
e Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Vandenberg
f National Reference Centre for Campylobacter, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universitaire de Bruxelles (LHUB-ULB), Brussels, Belgium
g School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick J. Biggs
e Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
h New Zealand Genomics Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00711-17
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report the complete genome sequence of the Campylobacter concisus type strain ATCC 33237 and the draft genome sequences of eight additional well-characterized C. concisus strains. C. concisus has been shown to be a genetically heterogeneous species, and these nine genomes provide valuable information regarding the diversity within this taxon.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The cells of Campylobacter concisus are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming (1), small (0.5 × 4 µm), and curved with rounded ends (2). C. concisus has been isolated from a variety of sites from the human body, including the gingival crevices of patients with gingivitis and periodontitis, stomach and esophagus biopsy specimens, blood, and both normal and diarrheic stools (2). In South Africa, C. concisus is the second most commonly isolated Campylobacter species in pediatric diarrheic stools (3). This species has also been shown to be phenotypically (4, 5) and genetically (6–11) heterogeneous.

Nine strains were sequenced in this study. C. concisus ATCC 33237 is the type strain of this species and was sequenced to completion. One strain, CCUG 19995, was isolated in 1987 in Sweden from a patient with pyrexia and exanthema. The remaining seven strains (Lasto28.99, Lasto61.99, Lasto64.99, Lasto127.99, Lasto205.94, Lasto220.96, and Lasto393.96) were isolated in South Africa between 1994 and 1999 from patients with dysentery, diarrhea, or loose mucoid stools. Strains CCUG 19995, Lasto127.99, and Lasto393.96 are from genomospecies 2, 5, and 6 (12, 13), respectively, while the remaining six strains are members of genomospecies 1 (12). The draft genomes of the eight strains have been well characterized and are genetically diverse (12).

Sequencing of ATCC 33237T was undertaken using the 454 FLX+ (Titanium chemistry), Illumina (HiSeq), and PacBio platforms. The 454 and Illumina reads were assembled using Newbler (version 2.6) (14, 15) into a single scaffold that was closed using PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. PacBio sequencing was performed to address repeat regions within the genome and an optical bacterial restriction map (16, 17) (restriction enzyme SpeI; OpGen, Gaithersburg, MD) was used to validate the assembly. Protein-coding genes, ribosomal loci, tRNAs, and gene start points were identified as described (18). Annotation was performed by BLASTP comparison to the proteomes of completed Campylobacter genomes or to proteins in the NCBI nonredundant database, and by identification of Pfam domains (v.27.0) (19).

Sequencing of CCUG 19995, Lasto28.99, Lasto61.99, Lasto64.99, Lasto127.99, Lasto205.94, Lasto220.96, and Lasto393.96 was undertaken using an Illumina MiSeq. Average coverage between 152× and 254× was achieved. Velvet (version 1.2.10) (20) was used to assemble the short reads, which were quality trimmed using SolexaQA++ (21) at a quality threshold of 0.01, and then sorted by length to remove all resulting reads less than 50 bases long. The draft genomes were annotated using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (22). The N50 values for these genomes, as calculated using the QUAST (23) online calculator (http://quast.bioinf.spbau.ru/ ), were between 134,605 and 349,534 bp.

The two genomes from genomospecies 2 and 5 (CCUG 19995 and Lasto127.99) had G+C contents of 39.4%, compared to G+C values of between 37.4% and 37.7% for the seven genomes from genomospecies 1 and 6.

Accession number(s).The genome sequences of ATCC 33237T, CCUG 19995, Lasto28.99, Lasto61.99, Lasto64.99, Lasto127.99, Lasto205.94, Lasto220.96, and Lasto393.96 have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers CP012541 , NDYN00000000 , NDYO00000000 , NEFM00000000 , NDYP00000000 , NDYQ00000000 , NDYR00000000 , NDYS00000000 , and NDYT00000000 , respectively. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment through ESR Core Funding.

The Illumina HiSeq sequencing was undertaken by SeqWright Genomic Services (GE Healthcare); the PacBio by James L. Bono at USDA, ARS, Clay Center; and the Illumina MiSeq by New Zealand Genomics Limited (NZGL), Massey University.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 June 2017.
    • Accepted 8 June 2017.
    • Published 20 July 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 Cornelius et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Vandamme P,
    2. Dewhirst FE,
    3. Paster BJ,
    4. On SLW
    . 2005. Family I. Campylobacteraceae, p 1145–1146. InBrenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (ed),Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol 2. The Proteobacteria. Part C. The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria. Springer, New York, NY.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Vandamme P,
    2. Dewhirst FE,
    3. Paster BJ,
    4. On SLW
    . 2005. Genus I. Campylobacter, p 1147–1160. InBrenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (ed),Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol 2. The Proteobacteria. Part C. The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria. Springer, New York, NY.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lastovica AJ
    . 2006. Emerging Campylobacter spp.: the tip of the iceberg. Clin Microbiol Newsl28:49–56. doi:10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2006.03.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Aabenhus R,
    2. Permin H,
    3. Andersen LP
    . 2005. Characterization and subgrouping of Campylobacter concisus strains using protein profiles, conventional biochemical testing and antibiotic susceptibility. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol17:1019–1024. doi:10.1097/00042737-200510000-00003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. On SLW,
    2. Holmes B,
    3. Sackin MJ
    . 1996. A probability matrix for the identification of campylobacters, helicobacters and allied taxa. J Appl Bacteriol81:425–432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Aabenhus R,
    2. On SL,
    3. Siemer BL,
    4. Permin H,
    5. Andersen LP
    . 2005. Delineation of Campylobacter concisus genomospecies by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and correlation of results with clinical data. J Clin Microbiol43:5091–5096. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5091-5096.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Deshpande NP,
    2. Kaakoush NO,
    3. Wilkins MR,
    4. Mitchell HM
    . 2013. Comparative genomics of Campylobacter concisus isolates reveals genetic diversity and provides insights into disease association. BMC Genomics14:585. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-585.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ismail Y,
    2. Mahendran V,
    3. Octavia S,
    4. Day AS,
    5. Riordan SM,
    6. Grimm MC,
    7. Lan R,
    8. Lemberg D,
    9. Tran TA,
    10. Zhang L
    . 2012. Investigation of the enteric pathogenic potential of oral Campylobacter concisus strains isolated from patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One7:e38217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kaakoush NO,
    2. Deshpande NP,
    3. Wilkins MR,
    4. Raftery MJ,
    5. Janitz K,
    6. Mitchell H
    . 2011. Comparative analyses of Campylobacter concisus strains reveal the genome of the reference strain BAA-1457 is not representative of the species. Gut Pathog3:15. doi:10.1186/1757-4749-3-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kalischuk LD,
    2. Inglis GD
    . 2011. Comparative genotypic and pathogenic examination of Campylobacter concisus isolates from diarrheic and nondiarrheic humans. BMC Microbiol11:53. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Van Etterijck R,
    2. Breynaert J,
    3. Revets H,
    4. Devreker T,
    5. Vandenplas Y,
    6. Vandamme P,
    7. Lauwers S
    . 1996. Isolation of Campylobacter concisus from feces of children with and without diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol34:2304–2306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. On SLW,
    2. Seimer BL,
    3. Brandt SM,
    4. Chung P,
    5. Lastovica AJ
    . 2013. Characterisation of Campylobacter concisus strains from South Africa using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiling and a genomospecies-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay: identification of novel genomospecies and correlation with clinical data. Afr J Microbiol Res7:1845–1851. doi:10.5897/AJMR12.2182.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vandamme P,
    2. Falsen E,
    3. Pot B,
    4. Hoste B,
    5. Kersters K,
    6. De Ley J
    . 1989. Identification of EF group 22 campylobacters from gastroenteritis cases as Campylobacter concisus. J Clin Microbiol27:1775–1781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Margulies M,
    2. Egholm M,
    3. Altman WE,
    4. Attiya S,
    5. Bader JS,
    6. Bemben LA,
    7. Berka J,
    8. Braverman MS,
    9. Chen YJ,
    10. Chen Z,
    11. Dewell SB,
    12. Du L,
    13. Fierro JM,
    14. Gomes XV,
    15. Godwin BC,
    16. He W,
    17. Helgesen S,
    18. Ho CH,
    19. Irzyk GP,
    20. Jando SC,
    21. Alenquer ML,
    22. Jarvie TP,
    23. Jirage KB,
    24. Kim JB,
    25. Knight JR,
    26. Lanza JR,
    27. Leamon JH,
    28. Lefkowitz SM,
    29. Lei M,
    30. Li J,
    31. Lohman KL,
    32. Lu H,
    33. Makhijani VB,
    34. McDade KE,
    35. McKenna MP,
    36. Myers EW,
    37. Nickerson E,
    38. Nobile JR,
    39. Plant R,
    40. Puc BP,
    41. Ronan MT,
    42. Roth GT,
    43. Sarkis GJ,
    44. Simons JF,
    45. Simpson JW,
    46. Srinivasan M,
    47. Tartaro KR,
    48. Tomasz A,
    49. Vogt KA,
    50. Volkmer GA,
    51. Wang SH,
    52. Wang Y,
    53. Weiner MP,
    54. Yu P,
    55. Begley RF,
    56. Rothberg JM
    . 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature437:376–380. doi:10.1038/nature03959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Miller JR,
    2. Koren S,
    3. Sutton G
    . 2010. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics95:315–327. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nagarajan N,
    2. Read TD,
    3. Pop M
    . 2008. Scaffolding and validation of bacterial genome assemblies using optical restriction maps. Bioinformatics24:1229–1235. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Saha S,
    2. Rajasekaran S
    . 2014. Efficient and scalable scaffolding using optical restriction maps. BMC Genomics15(Suppl 5):S5. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-S5-S5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Merga JY,
    2. Winstanley C,
    3. Williams NJ,
    4. Yee E,
    5. Miller WG
    . 2013. Complete genome sequence of the Arcobacter butzleri cattle isolate 7h1h. Genome Announc1(4):e00655-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00655-13.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Finn RD,
    2. Bateman A,
    3. Clements J,
    4. Coggill P,
    5. Eberhardt RY,
    6. Eddy SR,
    7. Heger A,
    8. Hetherington K,
    9. Holm L,
    10. Mistry J,
    11. Sonnhammer EL,
    12. Tate J,
    13. Punta M
    . 2014. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res42:D222–D230. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zerbino DR,
    2. Birney E
    . 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res18:821–829. doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Cox MP,
    2. Peterson DA,
    3. Biggs PJ
    . 2010. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics11:485. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tatusova T,
    2. DiCuccio M,
    3. Badretdin A,
    4. Chetvernin V,
    5. Nawrocki EP,
    6. Zaslavsky L,
    7. Lomsadze A,
    8. Pruitt KD,
    9. Borodovsky M,
    10. Ostell J
    . 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res44:6614–6624. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gurevich A,
    2. Saveliev V,
    3. Vyahhi N,
    4. Tesler G
    . 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics29:1072–1075. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter concisus ATCC 33237T and Draft Genome Sequences for an Additional Eight Well-Characterized C. concisus Strains
Angela J. Cornelius, William G. Miller, Albert J. Lastovica, Stephen L. W. On, Nigel P. French, Olivier Vandenberg, Patrick J. Biggs
Genome Announcements Jul 2017, 5 (29) e00711-17; DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00711-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Microbiology Resource Announcements article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter concisus ATCC 33237T and Draft Genome Sequences for an Additional Eight Well-Characterized C. concisus Strains
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Microbiology Resource Announcements
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Microbiology Resource Announcements.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter concisus ATCC 33237T and Draft Genome Sequences for an Additional Eight Well-Characterized C. concisus Strains
Angela J. Cornelius, William G. Miller, Albert J. Lastovica, Stephen L. W. On, Nigel P. French, Olivier Vandenberg, Patrick J. Biggs
Genome Announcements Jul 2017, 5 (29) e00711-17; DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00711-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MRA
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Getting Started
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us
  • ASM Author Center

Follow #MRAJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2576-098X